The quality bar; three worked capstone shapes; live scoping.
All tracks — 4 hours, studio sprint
Capstone Sprint: Build a Personal AI-Enhanced Creative Workflow
Leave with a working draft of one real thing — a workflow, tiny tool, prompt system, process board, or prototype — that removes friction from your practice, plus the 1-page process explanation that proves your judgment shaped it.
Instructor backup / finished example: capstone-gallery.html. Use it if the live tool run fails, or to reveal the finished structure after critique.
01This Week at a Glance
You will make: a capstone draft + a 1-page process explanation (what it solves, AI's role, your role, time saved, disclosure).
Friction, shape, riskiest assumption — written down.
Build the spine; refine and document, with a workflow clinic between.
90-second rough shows; ethics, usefulness, craft.
Ship one true thing that gives you leverage without taking your voice. Thirteen weeks of techniques are worth nothing until one lives in your practice. The trap to avoid: automating your art instead of your friction.
02The Capstone Quality Bar
Your capstone passes if it answers "yes" to all four. Print these; check them at the end.
- Real friction. It solves an actual recurring problem in your practice — not a hypothetical, not someone else's.
- Documented human decisions. Selection, rejection, refinement, and judgment are visible in the process explanation.
- Honest disclosure. It states clearly what AI did and what you did.
- Demo-able to an employer. You could show it in an interview and explain every choice without hand-waving.
A capstone that's small, finished, and passes all four beats an ambitious half-built thing every time.
03The Capstone Shapes — Pick Your Lane
| Shape | What it is | Built from | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Workflow / process system | A repeatable chain (brief → boards → shot list → checklist) | Weeks 2, 3, 5, 6 | Motion, animation, multi-stage pipelines |
| Prompt system / kit | A tuned, reusable prompt set for a recurring task | Weeks 2, 8, 10, 13 | UX, design, illustration, writing-heavy practices |
| Tiny coded tool | A single-file tool removing a specific friction | Week 11 | "I keep retyping/recalculating this" problems |
| Supervised automation | A spec'd agent workflow with checkpoints | Week 12 | Anyone drowning in file/admin chores |
| Process board / case study system | A documentation system that makes your process portfolio-ready | Weeks 4, 13 | Illustration, fine art, portfolio-building |
You've already drafted candidates: your Week 11 tiny-tool spec, your Week 12 workflow spec, your Week 5 motion pack, your Week 13 prompt pack. The fastest capstone is finishing one of those.
04The Build Sprint (today's structure)
- Scope ruthlessly: name the friction, pick the shape, cut scope to ~6 hours of work total.
- Riskiest assumption first: what sinks the whole capstone if it fails? Test that first, not the easy parts.
- Build the spine: get the core working end-to-end, ugly. A rough complete thing beats a polished fragment.
- Clinic: a classmate tests whether it actually saves time or improves output.
- Refine + document: fix what the clinic found; write the process explanation as you go.
- Prep the 90-second show: what it solves, the decision you're proudest of, AI vs. you.
05The Scoping Conversation
Run this with AI, then run the same scope past a human — humans catch the "still over-scoped" the model is too agreeable to push on.
06The 1-Page Process Explanation (the assessed deliverable)
This document is what makes the capstone yours. One page, these sections:
- The friction — the real recurring problem, with honest frequency.
- What I built — the workflow/tool/system, in two sentences.
- AI's role — specifically what AI did (drafted, generated, structured, automated).
- My role — the decisions, selections, rejections, and craft that are yours. The ✏️ moments.
- Proof it works — your acceptance check or time-saved estimate; ideally a clinic-partner's verdict.
- Disclosure — the honest line you'd attach if this went in a portfolio.
- What's next — the one thing you'd improve with more time.
Template starting points: workflow spec, tiny-tool spec, process documentation.
07Lab: Build Sprint + Workflow Clinic (the whole session)
- Scope (Hour 1): scoping conversation (AI + human); lock your shape and 6-hour scope; name your riskiest assumption.
- Sprint 1 (Hour 2): build the spine — riskiest assumption first, then core end-to-end. Ugly is fine.
- Workflow Clinic (~20 min): swap with a classmate; they actually try your thing. Does it save time / improve output? Would they use it? Where did it break?
- Sprint 2 (Hour 3): fix what the clinic found; write the process explanation as you go.
- Show-and-tell + peer review (Hour 4): 90-second rough shows; critique on ethics, usefulness, craft — not polish.
A fully-specified workflow or tool design — the complete spec + process explanation + a paper walkthrough — is a legitimate capstone. Several of the strongest capstones are plans for things students will build later.
Pick the smallest shape (a prompt kit or tiny-tool spec), use a standing friction, and aim for "finished and honest" over "ambitious." A complete small capstone is a real capstone.
08Integrity Check
- Does your capstone automate your friction or your art? If it's making your finished work, re-scope.
- Are your human decisions documented, not just claimed? Point to the ✏️ moments.
- Is your disclosure honest and specific enough to stand in an interview?
- Did a real human (clinic partner) confirm it does what you say? Untested "it saves time" is a hypothesis.
09Troubleshooting
| Problem | Fix |
|---|---|
| My idea is too big for today | Good problem. Cut to the spine: smallest version that solves the core friction. The rest is homework |
| I don't know which shape to pick | Pick the one closest to a draft you already have. Finishing beats starting |
| It works but feels unimpressive | "Impressive" isn't the bar — useful, finished, honest is. The two hours a week it saves IS the impressive part |
| The clinic partner couldn't use it | The most valuable result of the day. Fix the thing they tripped on — that's real product feedback |
| I'm building something that makes my art | Stop and re-scope. Aim the leverage at the friction around your art, not the art itself |
| I can't finish in the time | You don't have to — today's deliverable is a draft + process explanation. Document where you got to and what's next |
10Resources
- TemplateLinkedAI Workflow Spec Template (this course)The scaffold for workflow/automation capstones — steps, checkpoints, risks, disclosure.
- TemplateLinkedTiny Tool Spec Template (this course)For coded-tool capstones — user, problem, inputs, outputs, acceptance checks.
- TemplateLinkedProcess Documentation Template (this course)The backbone of your 1-page process explanation.
- ReferenceLinkedDemos & Visual Aids — Week 14 (this course)The three worked capstone shapes, in detail, with the scoping prompt.
- GuideLinkedBuilding Effective AI Agents — AnthropicIf your capstone is an automation: the simplest-pattern-that-works principle keeps your scope honest.
- RevisitLinkedYour own Weeks 5, 8, 11, 12, 13 deliverablesYour fastest capstone is finishing one of these. Re-read your own specs before starting.
Optional extension
- Build the second-smallest version: once the spine works, add the one feature your clinic partner most wanted — and only that one.
- Write the capstone's own case study (Week 13 method) — the extraction interview on your own build.
- Hard mode: design how your capstone fits a team's workflow, not just yours.
Next week: Demo Day & the Artist's AI Operating System → — present what you built, revise your Manifesto to v2, and build your system for staying current without drowning.