NCAD AI Workshop Week 13 / 15

All tracks — 4 hours, drop-in friendly

Jobs, Portfolios, Freelance, and Creative Career Leverage

Use AI to make your portfolio, CV, and outreach sharper and more yours — not more generic — and leave with a job-search prompt pack you'll reuse for years.

01This Week at a Glance

You will make: one rewritten case-study summary (or CV section) in your real voice + a job-search prompt pack.

1 · Concepts (40 min)

Career reality; case-studies-as-stories; the extraction interview; the Generic Detector; disclosure.

2 · Concepts (15 min)

Job-search systems — research, role matching, outreach, interview prep, freelance admin.

3 · Demo (35 min)

The same project written two ways: generic vs. extraction-interview.

4 · Lab + share (105 min)

Rewrite + prompt pack; rewrites read cold — does it sound like a person?

The week in one line

AI is your editor and interviewer, never your ghostwriter. The moment every applicant has AI write their cover letter is the moment AI-voice becomes a disqualifier. Generic is free now, so generic is worthless — the branding lesson, aimed at your career.

02Key Concepts

1 · The career reality, without the panic

Some production tasks are automating; the roles that remain reward judgment, taste, accountability, and critical AI use — the spine of this course. The CV reframe: don't write "good at AI tools" (everyone does). Write what's rare and true — you can direct AI, verify its output, and know when to refuse.

2 · Case studies are stories, not galleries

A case study is a narrative: client/brief → problem → process (your decisions, iterations, rejected directions) → outcome. Recruiters read to imagine working with you; the path is the juicy part. AI can't write your path — it wasn't there — but it's excellent at structuring one you feed it.

3 · The extraction interview (the core technique)

Don't ask AI to write your case study. Make it interview you, one question at a time, hunting for the constraint that hurt, the decision you'd defend, the thing you cut, what the client actually said, what you'd do differently. Then: "write using ONLY my answers, my phrasing where possible." Its questions, your answers, your authorship.

4 · The Generic Detector

AI-voice has tells — "elevate," "seamless," "passionate about," "stunning," "user-centric," "I'm excited to" — recognizable to every recruiter because every AI writes them. The skill: spot them (in AI's output and your own drafts) and replace each with something only you could have written.

Watch out

AI also inflates — claiming results you didn't measure, a role bigger than you had. Deflate it. A modest true claim beats an impressive unverifiable one; recruiters check, and getting caught inflating ends candidacies.

5 · Disclosure as a differentiator

When AI helped with a project, specific disclosure reads as confidence and process maturity. "Textures generated, then repainted by hand; concept and art direction mine" tells a recruiter you know exactly where your value sits. Vague "AI-assisted" invites the worst assumption. Start from the disclosure templates.

6 · Job-search systems (AI as research + admin engine)

03This Week's Words

Case studyThe portfolio write-up: problem, process, decisions, outcome.
Portfolio disclosureHonest, specific notes on what AI did. Done well, a differentiator.
Extraction interviewMaking AI interview you to surface the specifics only you know.
Generic detectorSpotting and replacing AI-voice stock phrases.
Process documentationIterations, rejected directions, decisions kept — authorship evidence.
Role matchingComparing a job ad to your real skills; finding fit and gaps honestly.
Impact-firstLeading with outcome, not task.
Outreach hookThe specific personal reason you want this place — the part AI can't write.
AI-voice inflationThe model's habit of overclaiming results and roles. Deflate it.
Career boundaryWhat you'll disclose, and where your value genuinely sits.

Full course glossary →

04Demo: Case Study Rewrite — Generic to Yours

I made this, so can you

One real project written two ways — proving AI is useless as a ghostwriter and powerful as an interviewer.

  1. Generate the generic version (knowingly): "write a portfolio case study for this project." Read it flat; the room calls the stock phrases; highlight them live.
  2. The extraction interview: "don't write yet — interview me," hunting for the constraint that hurt, the decision you'd defend, the thing you cut. Answer with specifics.
  3. The honest rewrite: "write 150 words using ONLY my answers, my phrasing, no adjectives I didn't earn — end with a disclosure line."
  4. Side by side: the room names the differences — specifics, stakes, voice, the disclosure line as a trust feature.
The planned failure

Version 2 still smuggles in 1–2 stock phrases. Find them, replace by hand, on screen — the Generic Detector is never AI's job to finish.

05Step-by-Step Workflows

The case study rewrite (any project)

  1. Generate the generic version knowingly — your "before" and stock-phrase target.
  2. Run the extraction interview — answer honestly, with specifics and stakes.
  3. Rewrite from your answers only — your phrasing, no unearned adjectives, a disclosure line if AI touched the project.
  4. Run the Generic Detector — replace every surviving stock phrase by hand.
  5. Deflate — keep only what's true and defensible in an interview.
  6. The 5-metre test — would a skimming recruiter learn something only-you in two sentences?

Build your job-search prompt pack

  1. Save the five system prompts into one doc.
  2. Customize each with your track, strengths, non-negotiables.
  3. Use them as templates per application — reusable for years.
  4. Add moves that work — the pack is a living career tool.

06Prompt Recipes

The extraction interview (the core)I'm writing a portfolio case study for this project: [2-line description]. Don't write anything yet. Interview me, one question at a time, max 6 questions, hunting for: the constraint that hurt, the decision I'd defend in a fight, the thing I cut that I loved, what the client/audience actually said, and what I'd do differently. After my answers, write a 150-word case study using ONLY my material, my phrasing where possible, no adjectives I didn't earn. End with one line disclosing how AI was used in the project (if at all).
The Generic DetectorRead this portfolio/CV text and flag every phrase that could appear in any creative's portfolio — the AI-voice tells (e.g., "passionate about", "seamless", "elevate", "stunning", "user-centric"). For each, ask me a question that would help me replace it with something only I could have written. Don't rewrite it for me.
The deflatorHere is my case study / CV section: [paste]. Challenge every claim about results, my role, and impact. Which are measurable, which are vague, which might be inflated? Rewrite only the overclaims as modest, defensible, true statements I could back up in an interview.
The role matcherHere is a job ad: [paste]. Here are my real skills and projects: [paste/list]. Where do I genuinely fit this role, where's the honest gap, and what 2 things should I learn or show to close it? Don't flatter me — I need the truth before I apply.
The interview rehearsalAct as the hiring manager for this role: [paste ad]. Ask me the 8 questions you'd actually ask a junior [track] candidate, one at a time. After each of my answers, tell me what was strong and what a real interviewer would still be unsure about. Be a tough but fair interviewer.
The outreach structurer (you write the hook)I want to reach out to [studio/person]. My genuine, specific reason for wanting THEM: [you write this — the part AI can't]. Structure a short, warm, non-generic outreach message around my hook. Keep my voice. No "I hope this email finds you well", no "I'm excited to", no flattery. Under 120 words.

07Lab: Generic Detector + Case Study Rewrite (70 min)

Cold start friendly. Bring a real project; no project? Use your strongest coursework.

  1. Generate + detect (15 min): generate the generic case study; run the Generic Detector; highlight every stock phrase. (Seeing AI write your generic version is the wake-up call.)
  2. Extraction interview (25 min): answer with real specifics and stakes; get the rewrite. This is the assessed deliverable — it must read like you.
  3. Deflate + detect again (15 min): challenge every claim; replace surviving stock phrases by hand. ✏️ the lines only you could have written.
  4. Prompt pack (15 min): customize at least three job-search prompts (role matcher + interview rehearsal + outreach structurer recommended).
Zero-AI track (fully equal)

Partner-run extraction interview (genuinely better interview practice), hand-written case study, peer red-pen for the Generic Detector.

08Integrity Check

This week's four
  1. Does your rewritten case study contain a sentence only you could have written? If not, keep extracting.
  2. Did you deflate every claim to what's true and defensible in an interview?
  3. Is your AI disclosure specific (what AI did, what you did) — not a vague "AI-assisted"?
  4. Your prompt pack uses AI for research/structure/admin and keeps the voice and judgment human.

09Troubleshooting

ProblemFix
The rewrite still sounds genericThe interview wasn't specific enough. Re-run demanding "the detail that would only be true of MY project"
I don't have impressive resultsGood — don't invent them. Process and decisions are the story; "I'd do X differently" shows growth recruiters value
AI keeps adding "passionate" / "excited"Ban them by name. They're the loudest AI-voice tells
The outreach message feels fakeYou let AI write the hook. The hook is yours — the specific reason you want THEM
Interview rehearsal feels too easy"Be a tough but fair interviewer who pushes back on vague answers" — and answer out loud
I'm anxious AI is taking these jobsName the real skill: directing and verifying AI, not "using" it. That's the rarer, hireable thing

10Resources

Optional extension

Next week: Capstone Sprint → — build the personal AI workflow, tool, or system that ties the whole course together.